FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT OF THE LIMIT OF A FUNCTION AMONG STUDENTS OF HIGHER EDU CATION INSTITUTIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-pmtp-2026-1-12

Keywords:

higher mathematics, mathematical analysis, methodology of forming a mathematical concept, limit of a function

Abstract

The article is devoted to the methodology of forming the concept of a limit of a function for students of higher education institutions. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that modern society is developing under conditions of the active application of mathematical methods in various spheres of human activity. This leads to increased requirements for the level of mathematical training of specialists in different fields. An important component of such training is students’ mastery of fundamental mathematical concepts. Among these concepts, in particular, is the concept of a limit of a function. Mastering this concept contributes to a better understanding by students of other key concepts of mathematical analysis, such as function continuity, the derivative, and the definite integral, which are based on the idea of a limiting process. The article analyzes domestic and foreign publications on the research topic. The developed methodology for forming the concept of a limit of a function involves introducing students to three definitions of the limit of a function at a point in the following sequence: in terms of sequences (according to Heine), in terms of neighborhoods, and in terms of the «ε–δ» definition (according to Cauchy). The chosen sequence makes it possible to implement the principle of moving from a definition that is more accessible for students’ understanding to a more complex one. Given the complexity of the formal definitions of the concept of a limit of a function at a point, their introduction is carried out using a concrete–inductive method with the involvement of appropriate graphical illustrations. In order to enhance students’ understanding of the more complex definitions of the limit of a function at a point (in terms of neighborhoods and the «ε–δ» definition), dynamic visualizations implemented using GeoGebra were employed. The proposed methodology for introducing the concept of a limit of a function is based on combining visual reasoning with subsequent analytical justification, which enables students to independently arrive at the formulation of various definitions of a function limit. This approach promotes the conscious and meaningful acquisition of the concept of a function limit by students.

References

Жалдак М. І., Михалін Г. О., Деканов С. Я. Одне узагальнення поняття границі функції та деякі його застосування. Науковий часопис Українського державного університету імені Михайла Драгоманова. Серія 2. Комп’ютерно-орієнтовані системи навчання. Київ, 2007. Вип. 5 (12). С. 3–9. URL: https://enpuirb.udu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/a2849bda-bd41-40b0-a49c-68c4da2202f8/content.

Колесник Т. В., Тарасенко О. В. Особливості введення поняття границі у шкільному курсі математики. Математика в школі. 2008. № 5. С. 34–39.

Михалін Г. О. Професійна підготовка вчителя математики у процесі навчання математичного аналізу. Київ : РНИЦ «ДІНІТ», 2003. 320 с.

Музиченко С. В. Деякі методичні особливості формування у старшокласників поняття границі. Актуальні питання природничо-математичної освіти. 2015. № 5–6. С. 18–24. URL: https://repository.sspu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/6529/1/Muzichenko%20S.%20S. pdf.

Томащук О., Самусенко П., Лещинський О., Іллічева Л. Методика формування поняття границі послідовності у студентів закладів вищої освіти. Фізико-математична освіта. 2024. Т. 39, № 2. С. 60–67. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31110/fmo2024.v39i2-08.

Третяк М. В., Босовський М. В. Деякі роздуми про вивчення границі числової послідовності. Science and Education a New Dimension: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2017. № 135. С. 14–17. URL: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/ api/file/viewByFileId/557428.pdf.

Cory В. L., Garofalo J. Using Dynamic Sketches to Enhance Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of Limits of Sequences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2011. Vol. 42, No. 1. P. 65–96. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0065.

Cotrill J., Dubinsky E., Nichols D., Schwingendorf K., Thomas K., Vidakovic D. Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 1996. Vol. 15, No. 2. P. 167–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90015-2.

Denbel D. G. Students’ misconceptions of the limit concept in a first calculus course. Journal of Education and Practice. 2014. Vol. 5, No. 34. P. 24–40. URL: https: //www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/17236.

Fernández-Plaza J. A., Rico L., Ruiz-Hidalgo J. F. Concept of finite limit of a function at a point: Meanings and specific terms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 44, No. 5. P. 699–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.805887.

Flores A., Park J. Students’ Guided Reinvention of Definition of Limit of a Sequence With Interactive Technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education. 2016. Vol. 16, No. 2. P. 110–126.

Liang S. Teaching the Concept of Limit by Using Conceptual Conflict Strategy and Desmos Graphing Calculator. International Journal of Research in Education and Science. 2016. Vol. 2, No. 1. P. 35–48. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id= EJ1105103.

Mamona-Downs J. Letting the intuitive bear on the formal; a didactical approach for the understanding of the limit of a sequence. Educational studies in mathematics. 2001. Vol. 48, No. 2. P. 259–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1016004822476.

Oehrtman M., Swinyard C., Martin J. Problems and solutions in students’ reinvention of a definition for sequence convergence. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 2014. Vol. 33. P. 131–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb. 2013.11.006.

Szydlik J. E. Mathematical beliefs and conceptual understanding of the limit of a function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2000. Vol. 31, No. 3. P. 258–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/749807.

Published

2026-04-21