UKRAINIAN-LANGUAGE ADAPTATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON SELF-PERCEPTIONS OF ORAL NARRATIVE COMPETENCIES AND ANXIETY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-psy-2026-2-25

Keywords:

oral narrative competence, narrative psychology, narrative competence, political psychology, information and semantic warfare, psychometric properties, questionnaire adaptation

Abstract

The current socio-political situation and the challenges associated with it highlight the need to study narrative competence, in particular oral narrative competence – defined as an individual’s ability to construct, organise, reproduce and express messages in a logical and coherent manner – as well as the level of anxiety experienced during this process. The aim of the study was to adapt and conduct psychometric validation of the Ukrainian version of the questionnaire on self-perceptions of oral narrative competence and anxiety, as well as to modify it for use amongst the adult population, regardless of the context in which oral speech takes place. Adaptation procedure involved direct and reverse translations, harmonisation of all wording, pilot testing and subsequent psychometric validation. The main study was conducted on a sample of 400 respondents aged between 18 and 75, of whom 323 were women and 77 were men. The analysis confirmed the discriminant validity of all items (r = 0.32–0.72); exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out, the results of which confirmed a two-factor structure. The Ukrainian version demonstrated a slightly different configuration compared with the original (in particular, items 1, 4, 7 and 9, which in the original belonged to a factor labelled «perceived oral narrative competence», were reclassified under the factor «anxiety in oral storytelling situations»). The internal consistency of the scales is high (α = 0.803–0.878; ω = 0.808–0.880). Convergent validity is confirmed by statistically significant correlations with scales of self-reflection, insight, situational and state anxiety. Retest results demonstrated high test-retest reliability (r = 0.728–0.754). Test norms for the questionnaire were developed using a percentile approach. Psychometric validation of the questionnaire confirmed that the Ukrainian version is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the level of self-perception of oral narrative competence and anxiety.

References

Агаєв Н. А., Кокун О. М., Пішко І. О., Лозінська Н. С., Остапчук В. В., Ткаченко В. В. Збірник методик для діагностики негативних психічних станів військовослужбовців : метод. посіб. Київ : НДЦ ГП ЗСУ, 2016. 234 с.

Гуцол К. В. Наративна компетентність як чинник самопроєктування особистості : дис. ... д-ра філософії : 053 Психологія / Інститут психології ім. Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Київ, 2020. 380 с.

Карамушка Л. М., Тиченко М. Є. Методики дослідження психологічних особливостей професійної кар'єри : психологічний практикум. Київ : Інститут психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України, 2023. 46 с.

Карпенко З.С. Меритократія vs какістократія: трансгенераційний вимір в українському контексті. Проблеми політичної психології. 2026. 19(33). С. 44–64. https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol19-Year2026-240

Чорній О. Наративна компетентність як предмет наукових досліджень. Вісник Національного університету оборони України. 2024. № 5 (81). С. 190–199. https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2024-81-5-190-199

Bonniga R., Saraswathi D. A. Literature review of Cronbach alpha coefficient and McDonald's omega coefficient. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 2020. V.7 № 6. P. 2943–2949. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35489.53603

Da Gama J., Negreiros J. The adaptation process of psychological instruments: A systematic review. Equilibrio Social: Perspectivas de Análisis y Mejora para las Sociedades del Siglo XXI. 2023. P. 223–244.

Faber G. Measuring self-perceptions of oral narrative competencies and anxiety in the EFL context. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 2012. Vol. 10, No. 3. P. 1343–1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v10i28.1537

Furr R. M. Psychometrics: An Introduction. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2022. 705 p.

Hernández A., Hidalgo M. D., Hambleton R. K., Gómez-Benito J. International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema. 2020. 32, № 3. P. 390–398. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306

Karpenko Z. Psychometrics, rhetoric, narrative in media psycholinguistics. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2020. Vol. 7, No. 2. P. 80–96. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.2.kar

Kline R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York; London : Guilford Press, 2016. 554 p.

Ramírez A., Burgos-Benavides L., Sinchi H., Quito-Calle J. V., Díez F. H., Rodríguez-Díaz F.J. Adaptation and validation of psychological assessment questionnaires using confirmatory factor analysis: A tutorial for planning and reporting analysis. Preprints, 2025. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1192.v1

Stefana A., Damiani S., Granziol U., Provenzani U., Solmi M., Youngstrom E. A., Fusar-Poli P. Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: Best practice guidelines for their development and validation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025. Vol. 15. Art. 1494261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494261

Published

2026-11-06

How to Cite

Chornii, O. (2026). UKRAINIAN-LANGUAGE ADAPTATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON SELF-PERCEPTIONS OF ORAL NARRATIVE COMPETENCIES AND ANXIETY. Наукові записки. Серія: Психологія, (2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-psy-2026-2-25