CHANGE OF ATTITUDE TO LANGUAGE NORMS IN VIRTUAL COMMUNICATION AND ITS CAUSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2024-210-39Keywords:
virtual communication, virtual communication language, language norms, spelling errors, language game, colloquial styleAbstract
Recently, the sphere of use of the language has expanded: the language of Internet communication, which has not yet received an unambiguous definition as a linguistic phenomenon, is actively developing. Linguists debate whether virtual communication can be considered a separate linguistic variety, sociolect or linguistic style. Communication through messengers, social networks, chats, forums not only simplified people’s lives, but also caused significant changes in the functioning of the language. The language used in virtual communication has extremely peculiar features. The main characteristics of this language are violations of generally accepted linguistic norms, especially spelling rules and lexical norms. Linguists explore the peculiarities of the language of Internet communication and attempt to determine the psychological and linguistic causes of radical changes that have occurred at its various levels. From the point of view of psychology, non-compliance with norms in the language of the Internet arises from the informal atmosphere of Internet communication. The speech behavior of network users can also be influenced by the fact that during virtual communication they have the illusion of anonymity, confidentiality. The Internet is becoming a place where a speaker can protest against normalization. A language game can be an important cause of violation of language norms as well. It can extend not only to spelling, but also to lexical, grammatical, word-forming, lexical levels of speech. Speakers often form non-standard forms for the purpose of self-expression in order to demonstrate creativity, stand out, attract attention with the help of comical or inappropriate posts. Since direct contact is impossible, communicators form non-standard word forms and break the rules to convey emotions. The most likely reason for the careless attitude to language norms is that informal Internet communication is a written form of the colloquial style and therefore acquires all the features corresponding to this style: the appearance of errors, the use of slang, surzhik, deviant or limited vocabulary.
References
Bak S., Kim P. Korean spelling error correction using a Hangul similarity algorithm. Advances on broad-band wireless computing, communication and applications 2 (2017) p. 223–229. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49106-6_21.
Cooper А. E., Diab D. L., Beeson K. M. Why Spelling Errors Matter: Online Company Reviews and Organizational Attraction. Corporative reputation review 23 (3) (2020) p. 160–169. doi:10.1057/s41299-019-00075-z.
Pickard A., Shenton A., Johnson A. Young people and the evaluation of information on the World Wide Web: principles, practice and beliefs. Journal of librarianship and information science, 46 (1), (2014) р. 3–20. doi:10.1177/0961000612467813.
Jeong A., Li H., Pan A. A sequential analysis of responses in online debates to postings of students exhibiting high versus low grammar and spelling errors. Etr&d-educational technology research and development 65 (5) (2017) p. 1175–1194.
Vazquez-Cano E., Holgueras G., Ana I., Saez-Lopez J. An analysis of the orthographic errors found in university students’ asynchronous digital writing. Journal of computing in higher education 31 (1) (2019) p. 1–20. doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9189-x.
Baron N. S. Do mobile technologies reshape speaking, writing, or reading? Mobile Media& Communication 1 (1) (2013) p. 134–140. doi:10.1177/2050157912459739.
Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 318 p.
AbuSa’aleek A. O. Internet linguistics: a linguistic analysis of electronic discourse as a new variety of language. International journal of English linguistics 1 (2015) p. 135–145, DOI 10.5539/ijel.v5n1p135
Myslin M., Gries St. K dixez? A corpus study of Spanish Internet orthography, Literary and linguistic computing 25 (1) (2010) 85–104. doi:10.1093/llc/fqp037.
Волошина Н. В., Полєжаєв Ю. Г. Мережеве мовлення юнаків і дівчат. Психолінгвістика. 2013. Вип. 14. С. 66–74. Режим доступу: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/psling_2013_14_7 Дата звернення: 20.07.2024.
Вострецова В. О. Мова віртуального спілкування підлітків. Соціальні комунікації сучасного світу: науково-теоретичний збірник. 2009. С. 236–238.
Стрельбицька Л. Інтернет як полігон розвитку природної мови. Вісник національного університету “Львівська політехніка”. 2005. Вип. 538. С. 33–38.
Vella L. Language used in Internet chatting and its effect on spelling. Perspectives on Maltese linguistics 14 (2014) р. 319-340. WOS:000345686800013
Ashwini K., Brundha M. P., Preejitha V. B. A Survey on increasing spelling errors due to increase use of digital Technology Among Students, Bioscience biotechnology research communications, 2020, 13(7), р. 247–250, DOI 10.21786/bbrc/13.7/41.
Guzalia G. A., Gulnaz G. S. Orthographic Mistakes In The Internet And Their Influence On The Literacy Of Tatar Students. Modern journal of language teaching methods, 2017, 7(9), p. 580–586.
K. Bedijs. Neography in the computer-mediated Spanish Communication. Alternative spellings in the chat network www.irc-hispano.es. Romanische forschungen, 2018, 130(3), p. 418–421.
Frohlich U. Neography in computer-mediated Communication of Spanish. For alternative spellings in the Chat Network. Zeitschrift fur romanische philology, 2017, 133(4), p.1155. doi:10.1515/zrp-2017-0062.
Клярська Г.Ю. «Особливості мови інтернет-спілкування (на прикладі україномовних користувачів) Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Сер: Філологія. 2018. № 32. Вип. 32 (3). С. 49–52.
Ковальчук І. А. Мовна специфіка спілкування в Інтернеті. Магістеріум. 2009. Вип. 37: Мовознавчі студії. С. 45–48.
Izazi Z. Z., Tengku-Sepora T. M. Slangs on Social Media: Variations among Malay Language Users on Twitter. Pertanika journal of social science and humanities, 2020, 28(1), p. 17–34. WOS:000520865200003.
Маковецька-Гудзь Ю. Українська мова у соціальних мережах. Мовні і концептуальні картини світу. Збірник наукових праць. Випуск 47. Ч. 1. К.: 2014. С. 658–663. URL: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgibin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?
Tagliamonte S. A., Denis D. Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language, American Speech, 2008, 83(1), p. 3–34. doi:10.1215/00031283-2008-001.
Herring S. C. Grammar and electronic communication. In C. Chapelle (Ed.). The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019. URL: http://ella.ils.indiana.edu/~herring/CEAL.pdf.
Sherman T., Švelch J. “Grammar Nazis never sleep”: Facebook humor and the management of standard written language. Language Policy, 2015, 14, p. 315–334. doi:10.1007/s10993-014-9344-9
Бочелюк В., Панов М. Проблемне поле психолінгвістичних досліджень дискурсу соціальних онлайн-мереж. Психолінгвістика. 2018. Вип. 24 (1). С. 79–96.
Barbosa B., Neto M. Heterogeneity of writing: proposed «Spelling errors» in digital social Networks and a sense construction, Revista de letras norte@mentos, 2019, 12(29), p. 158–176, WOS:000474261700010
Verheijen L. Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium. Written language and literacy, 2018, 21(1), p. 111–145. doi:10.1075/wll.00012.ver.
Чемеркін С. Українська мова в інтернеті: позамовні та внутрішньоструктурні процеси. Київ, 2009. 240 с.
Hargittai E. Hurdles to information seeking: spelling and typographical mistakes during users’ online behavior, Journal of the association for information systems, 2006, 7(1), p. 52–67. DOI 10.17705/1jais.00076
Akbiyik C., Karaduz A., Seferoglu S. A study of students’ use of written language in online chatting.Bilig, 2013, 64, p. 1–22 WOS:000317906100001.
Коневщинська Ольга Еммануїлівна. Проблема інтернет-мовлення старшокласників в електронних соціальних мережах. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, 2017. Том 60. № 4. С. 77–86.