METHODOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE CONCEPTS OF VERBAL AGGRESSION AND BULLYING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2025-215-33Keywords:
linguistic aggression, bullying, student environment, communication, methodological approaches, cognitive-discursive analysis, non-violent communicationAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of linguistic aggression and bullying in the student and cadet environment within the context of contemporary communicative and sociocultural processes. Linguistic aggression is conceptualized as a multidimensional socio-linguistic and psychocommunicative phenomenon manifested through explicit and implicit communicative strategies that significantly affect interpersonal relations and the psychological climate of academic communities. Special attention is paid to indirect forms of aggression such as irony, sarcasm, manipulative utterances, communicative exclusion, and the devaluation of the interlocutor’s status, as well as to manifestations of cyberbullying in the digital educational space, which are often perceived as normalized or socially acceptable. The methodological framework is grounded in an interdisciplinary integration of cognitive-discourse, pragmatic, sociolinguistic, and communicative-psychological approaches, enabling a holistic interpretation of aggressive verbal behavior in educational settings. The empirical data were obtained through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and the analysis of samples of natural spoken and online communication among higher education students. The findings reveal the predominance of indirect linguistic aggression, a high level of tolerance toward aggressive speech behavior, and gender-related differences in the selection of communicative strategies and speech models. The study concludes that linguistic aggression functions as an indicator of insufficient speech culture, emotional intelligence, social responsibility, and communicative reflection. The practical value of the research lies in its applicability to the development of preventive strategies, educational programs on communicative ethics, and institutional policies aimed at creating a safe, inclusive, and respectful educational environment in higher education institutions.
References
Штих І., Динис А. Дослідження булінгу в закладах освіти: гендерний аспект. Право і громадянське суспільство. 2023. Вип. 17, № 1. С. 123–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35619/praprv.v1i17.249
Малишева М. Г. Вербальна агресія в мережевому дискурсі: лінгвопрагматичний аспект : дис. д-ра філос. : 035 – філологія. Одеса, 2024. 248 с.
Пономарів О. Д. Культура слова: мовностилістичні та лінгвопрагматичні аспекти. 3-тє вид., доповн. Київ : Знання, 2019. 340 с.
Сучасна лінгвістика: напрями та проблеми : підручник. Полтава : Довкілля-К, 2008. 711 c.
Демченко О. В. Проблема запобігання та протидії булінгу в освітньому середовищі закладу вищої освіти. Педагогічна академія. 2023. № 2(3). С. 45–52.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13253457
Харченко Н. В. Соціально-психологічна діагностика агресивних форм поведінки в освітньому просторі. Педагогіка і психологія. 2022. № 2. С. 78–86. 2.
Vandebosch H., Van Cleemput K. Cyberbullying and aggression: The role of technology in verbal harassment. Journal of School Violence. 2018. Vol. 17, no. 1. P. 25–38.







