NOUN COMPOSITES-NEOLOGISM AND THEIR COMPONENTDOMINANT OF THE POLYSEMIC MODEL WITH TWO MEANINGS IN THE SENTENCE STRUCTURE OF THE GERMAN PRESS: SYNERGISTIC DIMENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2025-212-17Keywords:
compound noun-neologism, dominant constituent, polysemic model with two meanings, decoded nominations of the main/derived second meaning, human mental lexicon, linguistic synergy, principle of effort minimizationAbstract
The work is one of the stages of the study of the generation and decoding of complex nouns-neologisms with different semantic volume of their dominant component in simple and complex sentences of the modern German press from the standpoint of linguistic synergy. In the proposed article, such a synergistically directed analysis is focused on noun composites-neologisms with a dominant constituent, which is represented in the dictionary by the polysemic model of the noun with two meanings. The statement, which is methodologically important in the study declares that the driving factor is the synergistic law of language energy conservation and effort minimization, which directs the mental lexicon of a person to decode complex nouns-neologisms with the dominant semantic volume of the polysemic model of a word with two meanings. In the synergistic understanding, parallels are drawn between the dictionary as a representative of language generalization about the structured sum of knowledge of the extra-linguistic reality and the mental lexicon, which is not an arbitrary accumulation of entries, but constitutes a structured hierarchical system of such entries. The results obtained on the basis of the synergistic-quantitative approach were extrapolated to synergistic models in the correlation of decoded nominations of the main and derived second meaning of the dominant component of the studied polysemic format with simple and complex sentences of the German-language press. The synergistically directed hypothesis was confirmed that the involvement of the derived second meaning from the reservoir of a polysemic model, which has two meanings at the Langue level, as the closest to the main meaning of the word for the dominant component of innovative composites in simple and complex syntactic constructions successfully contributes to the needs of preserving linguistic energy and minimizing efforts for the human mental lexicon in the space of the German world of the press. Such linguistic synergistic exploration opens the prospects of modeling and forecasting the possible lexicalization of complex nouns-neologisms and replenishing Germanic linguistics with new knowledge about the German noun vocabulary.
References
Wellmann H. Morphologie der Substantivkomposita. Deutsche Wortbildung 4: Substantivkomposita (Komposita und kompositionsähnliche Strukturen I). Sprache der Gegenwart. Hrsg. vom Institut für deutsche Sprache. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991. Bd. 79. S. 3-111.
Zürn Constanze. Untersuchungen zur Semantik okkasioneller Nominalkomposita: Doktorarbeit. München: GRIN Verlag. 2013. 331 S.
Schonebohm Manfred. Wortbildung, Text und Pragmatik: Am Beispiel der Teil-von-Relation im Bereich der deutschen Nominalkomposition. In Lunder germanistische Forschungen. Lund, Gleerup. 1979. Bd. 49. 142 S.
Elsen Hilke. Neologismen: Ein Studienbuch. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag, 2022. 195 S.
Kopf Kristin. Fugenelemente diachron: Eine Korpusuntersuchung zu Entstehung und Ausbreitung der verfugenden N+N-Komposita. In Studia Linguistica Gemanica, Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2018. Bd. 133. 470 S.
Домброван Т. І. Актуалізація синергетичного підходу в сучасних лінгвістичних дослідженнях. Записки з романо-германської філології. Одеса: Фенікс, 2011. Вип. 26. С. 51-58.
Селіванова О. О. Лінгвістична енциклопедія Полтава: Довкілля. Київ, 2012. 844 с.
Altmann G. Modelling diversification phenomena in language. Diversification Processes in Language: Grammar. Hagen: Margit Rottmann Medienverlag, 1991. S. 33–46.
Köhler R. Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. Bochum: Studienverlag Brockmeyer, 1986. 200 S.
Meindl C. Methodik für Linguisten : Eine Einführung in Statistik und Versuchsplanung. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag, 2013. 302 S.
Кійко С. В. Мовна і міжмовна омонімія в німецько-українських паралелях: лінгвосинергетичний аспект: дис. … докт. філол. наук: 10.02.04 – Германські мови, 10.02.15 – Загальне мовознавство. Чернівці, 2015. 509 с.
Haken H. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Synergetik: allgemeine Prinzipien der Selbstorganisation in Natur und Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum, 2016. 328 S.
Zipf G. K. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge: Addison–Wesley, 1949. 573 p.
Löbner S. 2015. Semantik: Eine Einführung. 2., aktualisierte und stark erweiterte Aufl. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 462 S.
Schwarz-Friesel M. Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. 2. überarbeitete Aufl. Tübingen und Basel: Francke Verlag, 1996. 238 S.
Polenz P. Deutsche Satzsemantik. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gryeter, 2012. 389 S.
Maineke E. Das Substantiv in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag WINTER, 1996. 496 S.
Serebrennikow B. A. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: Die innere Struktur der Sprache: in drei Bänden. München–Salzburg, 1975. Bd. II. 521 S.
Fleischer W. Kommunikativ-pragmatische Aspekte der Wortbildung. Sprache und Pragmatik: Lunder germanistische Forschungen. 1979. № 48. S. 317 – 329.
Duden Onlinewörterbuch. URL: https://www.duden.de
Дребет В. Декодування іменників у німецькомовних текстах художньої прози та преси (синергетично-квантитативний підхід): монографія. Тернопіль: Астон, 2016. 400 с.
Wie die USA und Europa die Kurden im Stich ließen. URL: https://www.stern.de/politik/ausland/wiedie-kurden-von-den-usa-und-europa-im-stich-gelassen-wurden-8958168.html
Iran: "Wir fühlen uns nicht wie Menschen behandelt". URL: https://www.profil.at/ausland/Iran-USSanktionen-11198453






