THE TRANSLATION-STUDIES DIMENSION OF ONTOLOGISING TERMINOLOGICAL DEFINITIONS: TERM EQUIVALENCE UNDER CONCEPT-SYSTEM INCOMMENSURABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2026-218-2Keywords:
terminological definition, industrial ontology, ISO 15926, genus, interlingual equivalence, translation studiesAbstract
Drawing on verifiable textual material, the article establishes what the ontologisation of a terminological definition amounts to and what consequences it has for interlingual equivalence between English-language industrial resources and Ukrainian terminological codification. The material comprises four types of resources that codify the same subject field – oil-and-gas surface equipment – under four different regimes of definition-making: a formal ontology (the PCA PLM Reference Data Library, built on ISO 15926-14 / Industrial Data Ontology), a standardised data dictionary (CFIHOS v2.0), a professional glossary (the SLB Energy Glossary), and Ukrainian national terminological standards (ДСТУ 3809-98, ДСТУ 3063-95, ДСТУ 2611-94). A core sample of twenty concepts was coded against nine parameters: definition type, genus, explicit top-level categories, life-cycle markers, mode of fixing relations, functional component, inter-version shift, type of interlingual equivalence, and source of equivalence. It was established that, on definition pairs with shared wording, ontologisation reduces to a substitution in the genus slot while the differentia remains invariant, and that the operation is graded: from zero intervention through a bare category swap to full substitution with a functional genus. Life-cycle markers were shown to be removed at the very first step of standardisation and inherited thereafter in de-temporalised form, while the coverage of a resource was shown to follow its purpose rather than its subject field. A typology of equivalence asymmetries was substantiated: the chain of equivalence declared by the resources themselves closes at the level of the term and breaks at the level of the concept. The initial hypothesis was refined: ontological commitments define the boundaries of the possible definitional space, while the filling of that space remains with the compiler. Prospects are outlined: an audit of definitional quality in machine-readable terminological resources, a diachronic study of inter-version definitional shift, and a full typology of translation asymmetries
References
Штогрин М. В. Переклад термінів та термінологічних словосполучень у сфері нафтогазової промисловості: методи адаптації, мовні трансформації, міжгалузева та внутрішньогалузева омонімія. Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія»: серія «Філологія». Острог : Вид-во НаУОА, 2025. Вип. 25(93). С. 99–103. DOI: 10.25264/2519-2558-2025-25(93)-99-103
PLM Reference Data Library / POSC Caesar Association. URL: https://rds.posccaesar.org/ontology/plm/(дата звернення: 18.07.2026).
CFIHOS Reference Data Library. Version 2.0 / IOGP JIP36. 2025. URL: https://www.jip36-cfihos.org/cfihos-standards/ (дата звернення: 15.07.2026).
SLB Energy Glossary. URL: https://glossary.slb.com/ (дата звернення: 18.07.2026).
ISO 704:2022. Terminology work – Principles and methods. Geneva : International Organization for Standardization, 2022.
ISO 1087:2019. Terminology work and terminology science – Vocabulary. Geneva : International Organization for Standardization, 2019.
Batres R., West M., Leal D., Price D., Masaki K., Shimada Y., Fuchino T., Naka Y. An upper ontology based on ISO 15926. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2007. Vol. 31, No. 5–6. P. 519–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.07.004
Cimiano P., Montiel-Ponsoda E., Buitelaar P., Espinoza M., Gómez-Pérez A. A note on ontology localization. Applied Ontology. 2010. Vol. 5, No. 2. P. 127–137. DOI: 10.3233/AO-2010-0075
McCrae J. P., Arcan M., Asooja K., Gracia J., Buitelaar P., Cimiano P. Domain adaptation for ontology localization. Journal of Web Semantics. 2016. Vol. 36. P. 23–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2015.12.001
ДСТУ 3809-98. Компресори. Терміни та визначення. [Чинний від 2000-01-01]. Київ : Держстандарт України, 1999. 17 с.
ДСТУ 3063-95. Насоси. Класифікація. Терміни та визначення. [Чинний від 1996-07-01]. Київ : Держстандарт України, 1995. 76 с.
ДСТУ 2611-94. Арматура трубопровідна загальнопромислового призначення. Терміни та визначення. [Чинний від 1996-07-01]. Київ : Держстандарт України, 1994. 34 с.





