ABSTRACT AS A GENRE OF ENGLISH ACADEMIC DISCOURSE: RHETORICAL STRUCTURE AND LINGUISTIC FEATURES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2026-216-8

Keywords:

abstract, research article, academic discourse, linguistic features, English for Academic Purposes

Abstract

Research article abstracts play a crucial role in academic communication, as they summarize research content and influence both editorial decisions and readers’ interest. The paper examines the abstract as a genre of English academic discourse using a comparative analysis of its rhetorical structure and linguistic features in philology journal articles. We have focused on abstracts published in Ukrainian Category A and Category B journals, which differ in terms of international visibility and academic prestige. The corpus includes 100 English-language research article abstracts selected from four philological journals, with an equal number (25 abstracts) representing each journal and each category (50 abstracts). The study employs a combination of descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative methods. The five-move rhetorical model was applied to identify the distribution of rhetorical moves. The linguistic analysis was simultaneously used to examine voice and tense patterns across the abstracts. Research findings show that abstracts of Category A journals have a more comprehensive and standardized rhetorical structure than those from Category B journals, particularly in the inclusion of methodological and concluding moves. Move 2 (Aim/Purpose) appears consistently across both categories, whereas the Conclusion/Suggestions move is the least frequent. The analysis of grammatical voice reveals a general preference for the active construction, particularly in the Introduction and Results/Findings sections, while the passive voice dominates in the Methods section. The analysis of tense usage shows that the Present Simple and Past Simple tenses are used most frequently, reflecting their functional roles in summarizing research aims and reporting results. The paper finds that rhetorical organization and linguistic choices are deeply connected in the abstracts. It therefore strongly suggests explicit instruction of both rhetorical and linguistic aspects in English for Academic Purposes classes aimed at novice Ukrainian researchers

References

Gobekci E. Rhetorical Structure and Linguistic Features of Research Article Abstracts in the Humanities: The Case of Lithuanian, English, and Russian. Taikomoji Kalbotyra. 2023. No. 19. P. 33–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Taikalbot.2023.19.4

Ventola E. Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. Writing vs speaking: language, text, discourse, communication. Gunter Narr Verlag, 1994. P. 333–352.

Belcher W. L. Writing a journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. London: SAGE Publication Inc., 2009. 351 p.

Swales J. M., Feak C.B. Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2009. 87 p.

Santos, M. B. D. The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk. 1996. Vol. 16.4. P. 481–500.

Ahmed S. Rhetorical organization of tourism research article abstracts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. No. 208. P. 269–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.203

Cross C., Oppenheim C. A Genre Analysis of Scientific Abstracts. Journal of Documentation. 2006. Vol. 62. P. 428–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610700953

San L. Y., Tan H. A comparative study of the rhetorical moves in abstracts of published research articles and students’ term papers in the field of computer and communication systems engineering. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 2012. Vol. 1(7). P. 40–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/

ijalel.v.1n.7p.137

Іваницька Н. Номіналізація в науковому дискурсі: перекладознавчий аспект. Лінгвістичні студії. 2022. Вип. 44. C. 75–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2022.44.5

Чепіль О. Я. Критерії написання та аналіз лінгвістичних особливостей conference abstracts у розвитку навичок академічного письма ( на матеріалі англомовних тез доповідей для наукових конференцій). Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія»: серія «Філологія».

Вип. 17(85). С. 102–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2023-17(85)-102-106

Arsyad S., Hakim H., Astria H. Rhetorical structure and linguistic features of abstracts: A comparative study of local, national and international journals in English education written by Indonesian authors. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Seni. 2021. Vol. 22. No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/komposisi.v22i1.109987

Pereira M. G. O resumo de um artigo científico. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2013. Vol. 22(4). P. 707–708. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742013000400017

Garcia D. C. F., Gattaz C. C., Gattaz N. C. The relevance of title, abstract, and keywords for scientific paper writing. Revista de Administração Contemporânea. 2019. Vol. 23. P. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019190178

Марущак Н. Поетика Е.А. По в контексті міждисциплінарних досліджень. Studia Philologica. 2025. № 1 (24). С. 169–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425.2025.2412

Sazonova Ya., Oleksenko O. Evaluative Potential of Grammatical Gender Asymmetry in Ukrainian Socio-Political Media Discourse. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology. 2025. Vol. 1. Issue 29. P. 234–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32342/3041-217X-2025-1-29-14

Кузнєцова І. В. Мова англомовної наукової анотації. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Сер.: Філологія. 2024 № 69 Том 1. С. 187–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2409-1154.2024.69.1.40

Іваницька Н. Б., Іваницька Н. Л. Вторинна предикація як засіб економії мовних ресурсів в аналітико-інформаційному жанрі англомовних бізнесових медіавидань. Наукові записки. Серія: Філологічні науки. 2025. Вип. 212. С. 133–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2025-212-19

Ivanchenko M., Kolegaeva I. The concept of betrayal in the consciousness of the English: A psycholinguistic study. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2024. Vol. 11(2). P. 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2024.11.2.iva

Downloads

Published

2026-04-14

How to Cite

Tymoshchuk N. М. (2026). ABSTRACT AS A GENRE OF ENGLISH ACADEMIC DISCOURSE: RHETORICAL STRUCTURE AND LINGUISTIC FEATURES. Наукові записки. Серія: Філологічні науки, (216), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2026-216-8