COMPARATIVE CONTRAST OF FORMS, FUNCTIONS AND ROLES OF FEMININE NOUNS IN THE UKRAINIAN, GERMAN AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2025-215-43

Keywords:

feminine nouns, masculine nouns, gender, Ukrainian language, German language, English language, typological comparison

Abstract

The article considers feminine nouns as a phenomenon that is specific in modern linguistics. The study topicality is explained by the special place of language in formation of national identity, especially in a crisis period, when the state defends its independence. On the other hand, the study relevance is based on values of a democratic society, where gender equality is a priority, which is fixed in language as a means of social thinking and functioning. Authors’ conduct of the study is appropriate, since the topic of gender equality and the masculinity-feminity balance arouses a deep interest among linguists in Scopus publications for the period 2020–2025. It is noteworthy that scientists are interested in gender issues in aspects of national identity both within a language group and neighboring ones. High popularity of feminine nouns in the European space and strengthening of the Ukrainian national identity during the socio-political turbulence (war) determine the authors’ choice of thematic direction of the research. The study object is feminine nouns in the Ukrainian, German and English languages from a linguistic and sociocultural point of view. The study subject is peculiarities of formation, functioning and use of feminine nouns in these languages, their role in reflecting social processes and forming the language norm. The research is implemented via the comparative method for typological analysis of feminine nouns from the Slavic-Germanic perspective with determination of their forms, functions and influence on the linguistic identity formation. Within the study, it was established that the main means of transmitting gender features can be purely lexical resources (English) or morphological and grammatical ones (Ukrainian and German). In the first case, the pattern is due to absence of the grammatical category of gender and tendency to inclusive neutralization, when equality of rights and freedoms is conveyed through lexically neutral words. In the second case, presence of gender led to emergence of morphological elements (suffixes). Their gender functionality is variable. In the German culture the suffix -in- has firmly established itself as a designation of the female gender. In the Ukrainian language, feminine suffixes are a relatively young phenomenon, which causes a contradictory attitude to processes of gender word formation. The research results can be a basis for conducting new studies in intralingual and interlingual aspects.

References

Steriopolo O., Schütze C. Referential means in German: An experimental study comparing feminine epicene nouns with masculine generic nouns. Linguistics. 2025. Vol. 63. Issue 4. P. 1065–1101. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0049.

Lehecka T. Antecedents of a novel gender-neutral pronoun: A corpus-based approach to pronoun reference in Swedish. Corpora. 2023. Vol. 18. Issue 3. P. 329–356. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2023.0290.

Storme B., Delaloye Saillen L. Effects of grammatical gender on gender inferences: Evidence from French hybrid nouns. Linguistics Vanguard. 2024. Vol. 10. Issue 1. P. 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0064.

Abbondanza M., Galimberti V., Bonomi V., Reverberi C., Durante F., Foppolo F. Neutralizing gender in role nouns: Investigating the effect of ə in written and oral Italian. Frontiers in Commununication. 2025. Vol. 9. Article 1530778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1530778.

Irizarry A. R., Tamargo R. E. G. Processing of pronouns with gender-inclusive –x in Spanish: An eye-tracking study. Social Psychological Bulletin. 2025. Vol. 20. Article e13611. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13611.

Chalyvidou D., Weber A. The role of grammatical gender and gender stereotypes in noun processing: The tug of war in Greek. Social Psychological Bulletin. 2025. Vol. 20. Article e13469. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13469.

Vajdlová M. Czech i-stem feminine nouns ending in -n and their development in Older Czech (from 1300 to 1900). Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Slowianskiej. 2022. Vol. 57. Article 2719. https://doi.org/10.11649/sfps.2719.

Mikić Ljubi J., Matkovič A., Bon J., Kanjuo Mrčela A. The effects of grammatical gender on the processing of occupational role names in Slovene: An event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 13. Article 1010708. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010708.

Sazonova Y., Oleksenko O. Evaluative potential of grammatical gender asymmetry in Ukrainian social and political media discourse. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology. 2025. Vol. 1. Issue 29. P. 234–250. https://doi.org/10.32342/3041-217X-2025-1-29-14.

Alkhalil S. F. A. Women’s representations in Saudi Arabia: The case of universities’ online discourses. Cogent Arts and Humanities. 2024. Vol. 12. Issue 1. Article 2539718. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2539718.

Abu-Odeh M. H., Mahadin R. S. An optimality-based analysis of the morphophonemics of diminutives in Bani Sakhar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2025. Vol. 15. Issue 6. P. 1908–1917. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1506.19.

Cruz A. Linguistic factors modulating gender assignment in Spanish-English bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2023. Vol. 26. Issue 3. P. 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000839.

Sotiropoulou M.-S., Cornwell S. Grammatical gender correspondence between French, Greek, and Spanish nouns. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech. 2023. Vol. 5. Issue 2. P. 231–286. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.26510.

Kim J., Angs S., Gygax P., Gabriel U., Zufferey S. The masculine bias in fully gendered languages and ways to avoid it: A study on gender neutral forms in Québec and Swiss French. Journal of French Language Studies. 2023. Vol. 33. Issue 1. P. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095926952200014X.

Verelst N. Gender marking in inanimate contexts: Developments in Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen. 2023. Vol. 104. P. 154–187. https://doi.org/10.2143/LB.104.0.3293186.

Jarrah M., Jaradat A. The syntax of the diminutive morpheme -aaj in Egyptian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Jordanian Arabic. Linguistics Vanguard. 2022. Vol. 8. Issue 1. P. 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0031.

Фаріон І. Фаріон про фемінітиви: Хто й чому просуває ґвалтування української мови. https://surl.li/ifwaxu (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Merriam-Webster Dctionary. Feminine. https://surl.li/wwmstj (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Сабадир Г. Структура фемінітивів сучасної української мови. Актуальнi питання гуманiтарних наук. 2023. Том 2. Вип. 62. С. 168–172. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/62-2-27.

Малахова О. Фемінітиви – не данина моді, вони властиві українській мові як системі. https://surl.li/ugguya (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Duden Online. Studierende. https://surl.li/voevra (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Davlyatova M. Linguistic factors of formation of feminitives and gender neutral words in professional lexicon in the English language. International Conference “Humanistic Role of Language and Literature in the Contemporary Globalization”. 2024. P. 315–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.2024/dmtbqa13

Деркачова О. День вчителя і вчительки: коли ми полюбимо фемінітиви в українській мові?https://surl.lt/gvhoqf (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Леся Українка. Така її доля. https://surl.li/tbqcza (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Стежко Ю. Фемінітиви в українській мові: лінгвосоціальний контекст. Філологічні трактати. 2020. Том 12. Вип. 2. С. 104–113. https://surli.cc/xkxckl (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Education.ua. Фемінітиви. Як правильно формувати фемінітивні словоформи. https://surl.lu/nrjnmh (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Селіванова О. Сучасна лінгвістика: термінологічна енциклопедія. Полтава: Довкілля-К, 2008. 713 с. https://surl.li/qjwljc (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Hellinger M., Bußmann H. Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003. 391 p. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.11?locatt=mode:legacy.

Kasper S. Sprachideologien in der öffentlichen Debatte um geschlechtergerechte Sprache. Ein kritischer Versuch. Studia Germanica Gedanensia. 2022. Heft 47. S. 24–39. https://doi.org/10.26881/sgg.2022.47.02.

Bauer L. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 311 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846.

Holmes J. Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, 2013. 512 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. They. https://surl.li/tldvpq (дата звернення: 09.11.2025).

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Stepanov, V. V., & Zabashta, D. V. (2025). COMPARATIVE CONTRAST OF FORMS, FUNCTIONS AND ROLES OF FEMININE NOUNS IN THE UKRAINIAN, GERMAN AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES. Наукові записки. Серія: Філологічні науки, (215), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-4077-2025-215-43