DEPARTMENT "FOREIGN ARMIES EAST" AND THE EVOLUTION OF GERMAN INTELLIGENCE ON THE EASTERN FRONT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-hist-2026-1-13Keywords:
agent-operational activity, archival sources, World War II, history of military art, intelligence, Soviet prisoners of war, Eastern FrontAbstract
The article examines the activities of the «Foreign Armies East» department in the context of the evolution of German military intelligence on the Eastern Front during the Second World War. The author argues that the initial phase of the war against the Soviet Union exposed a profound crisis in German military intelligence analysis, which relied on fragmented and often outdated information about the USSR. This resulted in a critical underestimation of Soviet mobilization resources, the potential of mechanized formations, and the ability to regenerate strategic reserves – factors that ultimately contributed to the failure of Operation Barbarossa. Drawing on little‑known sources, the study concludes that fundamental changes in the functioning of German military intelligence began in the spring of 1942 with the appointment of Reinhard Gehlen as head of the department. Under his leadership, the primary task of «Foreign Armies East» became the assessment of the Red Army’s operational intentions through the integrated analysis of aerial reconnaissance data, radio intercepts, and firsthand testimonies of participants. In the highly dynamic conditions of the Eastern Front, interrogations of Soviet prisoners of war and defectors emerged as the most reliable source of information. To this end, new approaches to working with prisoners were developed, enabling the production of higher‑quality analytical intelligence for the German command. The author emphasizes that, despite improvements in intelligence gathering at the tactical level, Gehlen and his organization failed to achieve success at the strategic level. Erroneous assessments of the Red Army’s intentions during the Stalingrad campaign in 1942 were not forgotten by the higher political leadership of the Third Reich and further undermined the credibility of the intelligence service. Assessing the department’s activities in the final stage of the war, the article notes that its head increasingly focused on preserving vast collections of accumulated intelligence as a key asset for the postwar future. Successful cooperation with the United States government enabled the former German intelligence apparatus not only to avoid prosecution for its service to the Nazi regime but also to become the foundation for the creation of a new intelligence structure in postwar Germany.
References
Боляновський А., 2014. Український повстанський рух і німецькі окупаційні інстанції на Волині на початку 1944 року: між протистоянням і нейтралітетом. Україна: культурна спадщина, національна свідомість, державність. (24). 181–210.
Боляновський А., 2021. Спроби зупинити взаємне протистояння: переговори між представниками українського і польського підпілля у 1941–1945 роках. У: За свободу: українсько-польський діалог та спроби порозуміння. Львів. 385–471.
Пик С., 2012a. Розвідувальна підготовка Німеччини до війни проти СРСР. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія міжнародні відносини. (31). 9–17.
Пик С., 2012b. Таємна дипломатія і розвідка у міжнародних відносинах. Львів.
Чайковський А. С., 2013. ОУН‑УПА і гітлерівські спецслужби: до історії співробітництва. Архіви України. 56–87.
Чайковський А., 2025. Осьодло В., Воєнне мистецтво партизанської боротьби. Воєнно-історичний вісник. 54(4), 74–87.
Donohue A., 2018. Adolf Hitler and German Military Intelligence on the Eastern Front: Operations Blau and Edelweiß (January–November 1942). The Journal of Slavic Military Studies.31(3). 372–395.
Gehlen R., 1972. The Service: The Memoirs of General Reinhard Gehlen. New York.
Müller R.-D., 2018. Reinhard Gehlen: Geheimdienstchef im Hintergrund der Bonner Republik. Die Biografie. Т. 1. Berlin.
Pahl M., 2012. Fremde Heere Ost: Hitlers militärische Feindaufklärung. Berlin.
Pahl M., 2020. "My strength is my mistrust": Hitler and his military intelligence on the Eastern Front. У: S. Ball, P. Gasser, A. Gestrich та S. Neitzel, ред. Cultures of Intelligence in the Era of the World Wars. Oxford. 107–125.
Thomas D., 1987. Foreign Armies East and German Military Intelligence in Russia 1941–45. Journal of Contemporary Histor. 22 (2). 261–301.
Wilhelm, H.-H. 1974. Die Prognosen der Abteilung Fremde Heere Ost 1942–1945. У: H.-H. Wilhelm та L. d. Jong, уклад. Zwei Legenden aus dem Dritten Reich: quellenkritische Studien. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. 7–75.





