THE 2014 OCCUPATION OF CRIMEA: PERSPECTIVES ON THE MECHANISMS OF MILITARY-POLITICAL AND INFORMATION AGGRESSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-hist-2026-1-8Keywords:
occupation of Crimea, information and psychological operations, information and psychological influence, Russian aggression, Russian Black Sea Fleet, propaganda, information warfare, disinformation, agents of influence, destabilizationAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the preparation, mechanisms of implementation, and information-political support of the occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea by the Russian Federation in 2014. The study examines the process of forming the prerequisites for the implementation of the Russian scenario of hybrid aggression, which effectively began with the proclamation of Ukraine’s independence and became systemic after the "Crimean crisis" of 1992–1994. Particular attention is paid to the long-term activities of Russian state institutions, special services, cultural and public organizations aimed at creating a favorable informational and political environment on the peninsula for the implementation of the project of the "return of Crimea". The article analyzes the role of a network of pro-Russian political parties, public organizations, media outlets, and cultural initiatives that shaped the narrative in public consciousness portraying Crimea as a "historically Russian territory". Considerable attention is devoted to the use of so-called "soft power" instruments, including the activities of the Russkiy Mir Foundation, the Foundation for the Support of Compatriots Abroad, as well as Russian diplomatic and consular institutions that carried out information and propaganda influence under the guise of cultural and humanitarian cooperation. The military component of the operation is also examined, particularly the use of the infrastructure of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, the activities of reconnaissance and sabotage groups, the formation of paramilitary structures such as the so-called "Crimean self-defense forces", and their interaction with regular units of the Russian armed forces. The key stages of the occupation are analyzed, from the organization of pro-Russian rallies and the destabilization of the socio-political situation to the seizure of administrative buildings, the blockade of Ukrainian military units, and the organization of the pseudo-referendum on March 16, 2014. Special attention is paid to information and psychological operations aimed at constructing the image of a "Ukrainian threat", mobilizing pro-Russian elements of the population, and creating the illusion of mass support for the annexation. It is demonstrated that the information component of the operation was an integral part of the military aggression and played a crucial role in demoralizing Ukrainian forces and legitimizing the actions of the Russian Federation. The study concludes that the occupation of Crimea was the result of long-term and comprehensive preparation that combined military, informational, political, and social instruments of influence. The experience of this operation demonstrates the characteristic features of modern hybrid warfare, in which information and psychological operations, manipulation of public opinion, the use of networks of agents of influence, and local collaborationist structures become key instruments.
References
Baranets V., 2019. Spetsoperatsyia “Krym 2014” [Special Operation "Crimea 2014"]. Moskva. (In Russian).
Berezovets T., 2015. Okupatsiia Krymu. Knyha dokumentiv i khronolohii krymskykh podii liutoho – bereznia 2014 roku [The Occupation of Crimea: A Book of Documents and a Chronology of Events in Crimea in February – March 2014]. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian).
Holovchenko V., 2016. Doroshko M. Hibrydna viina Rosii proty Ukrainy: istoryko-politychne doslidzhennia [Hybrid wine from Russia against Ukraine: A historical and political study]. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian).
Horbulin V. P., 2017. Khroniky peredbachen: 2006–2017 [Chronicles of Predictions: 2006–2017]. Kharkiv. (In Ukrainian).
Horbulin V. P., 2016 Aneksiia Krymu: peredumovy, mekhanizmy ta naslidky [The Annexation of Crimea: Preconditions, Mechanisms, and Consequences]. [Online]: Available from: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/ 2016-11/Crimea_2014.pdf [Accessed: 30. 12. 2025]. (In Ukrainian).
Dykyi E., 2016. Hybrydnaya voyna Rossii: opyt Ukrayny dlia stran Baltii [Russia's Hybrid War: Ukraine's Experience for the Baltic States]. [Online]: Available from: https://biblioteka.lka.lt/data/PDFleidiniai/2016-2020/2016-dikij-Gibridnaja_voina_Rosii.pdf [Accessed: 30. 12. 2025]. (In Russian).
Pomerantsev P., 2020. Tse ne propahanda. Podorozh na viinu proty realnosti [This isn't propaganda. A journey into the war against reality]. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian).
Tverdokhlib Yu. M., 201). Informatsiino-psykholohichni operatsii u rosiisko-ukrainskii hibrydnii viini [Information and Psychological Operations in the Russian-Ukrainian Hybrid War]. Dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. polit. nauk. Chernivtsi. (in Ukrainian).
Turanskyi M. O., 2020. Informatsiino-psykholohichne zabezpechennia operatsii z aneksii Krymu Rosiiskoiu Federatsiieiu: istorychni peredumovy ta praktychna realizatsiia [The Information and Psychological Framework for the Russian Federation’s Annexation of Crimea: Historical Background and Practical Implementation]. Dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. ist. nauk. Lviv. (in Ukrainian).
Fedorov Yu., 2016. «HYBRID» WAR À LA RUSSE: «Hybrydnaia» voina po-russky [«Hybrid» War, Russian Style]. Kyev. (In Russian).
Chmykhalo H., 2026. Investytsii v khaos: Rosiia – Ukraina (Krym). Yak derzhavam postradianskoho prostoru ne dopustyty rosiiskoho stsenariiu hibrydnoi viiny [Investments in chaos: Russia – Ukraine (Crimea). How post-Soviet states can prevent a Russian hybrid war scenario]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).
Chmykhalo H., 2026. Symbioz rosiiskykh spetssluzhb ta kryminalitetu yak chynnyk destabilizatsii na Krymskomu pivostrovi u [The symbiosis of Russian special services and organized crime as a factor of destabilization on the Crimean Peninsula in] 1991–2014. Voienna istoriia Ukrainy: istorychna retrospektyva: zb. mater. mizhvuz. nauk.-prakt. seminaru, 26 hrudnia 2025 r. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).
Chmykhalo H., 2025. Vykorystannia Rosiiskoiu Federatsiieiu muzyky ta kinematohrafa dlia formuvannia nehatyvnoho obrazu Ukrainy v Avtonomnii Respublitsi Krym [The Russian Federation’s Use of Music and Film to Create a Negative Image of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea] (1991–2014). Voiennoistorychnyi visnyk. № 4 (58). 95–100. (In Ukrainian).
Chmykhalo H., 2025. Informatsiino-propahandystski vplyvy RF u Krymu [Russian Federation’s Information and Propaganda Influence in Crimea] (1991–2014). Istoriia ta arkheolohiia. (2). 185–192. (In Ukrainian).
Yablonska N. V., 2006. Etnichna presa Krymu: istoriia ta suchasnist [The Ethnic Press of Crimea: History and the Present]. Sevastopol. (In Ukrainian).





